Jonny Lamb
2008-01-07 03:02:46 UTC
Hi again,
Does anyone have any objections to me renaming the module "rra" to
"librra". It is already called "librra" in distribution packages (E.g.
[0]) and the name "librra" conforms more with other SynCE modules.
Of course, my rename would have no API change.
Perhaps I could be enlightened as to why this module was called "rra" in
the first place? After all, librapi2 contains a library and a number of
tools, just as rra does.
Thanks,
[0] http://packages.debian.org/librra
Does anyone have any objections to me renaming the module "rra" to
"librra". It is already called "librra" in distribution packages (E.g.
[0]) and the name "librra" conforms more with other SynCE modules.
Of course, my rename would have no API change.
Perhaps I could be enlightened as to why this module was called "rra" in
the first place? After all, librapi2 contains a library and a number of
tools, just as rra does.
Thanks,
[0] http://packages.debian.org/librra
--
Jonny Lamb, UK ***@jonnylamb.com
http://jonnylamb.com GPG: 0x2E039402
Jonny Lamb, UK ***@jonnylamb.com
http://jonnylamb.com GPG: 0x2E039402