Discussion:
rra or librra ?
Jonny Lamb
2008-01-07 03:02:46 UTC
Permalink
Hi again,

Does anyone have any objections to me renaming the module "rra" to
"librra". It is already called "librra" in distribution packages (E.g.
[0]) and the name "librra" conforms more with other SynCE modules.

Of course, my rename would have no API change.

Perhaps I could be enlightened as to why this module was called "rra" in
the first place? After all, librapi2 contains a library and a number of
tools, just as rra does.

Thanks,

[0] http://packages.debian.org/librra
--
Jonny Lamb, UK ***@jonnylamb.com
http://jonnylamb.com GPG: 0x2E039402
Andreas Bierfert
2008-01-07 09:04:35 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 03:02:46 +0000
Post by Jonny Lamb
[0] http://packages.debian.org/librra
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/librapi


- Andreas
--
Andreas Bierfert, B.Sc. | http://awbsworld.de | GPG: C58CF1CB
***@lowlatency.de | http://lowlatency.de | signed/encrypted
phone: +49 2402 102373 | cell: +49 173 5803043 | mail preferred
Andreas Bierfert
2008-01-07 09:07:51 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:04:35 +0100
Post by Andreas Bierfert
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/librapi
Ups sorry, damn c&p I meant:

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/librra

but imo naming it librra is the right thing.


- Andreas
--
Andreas Bierfert, B.Sc. | http://awbsworld.de | GPG: C58CF1CB
***@lowlatency.de | http://lowlatency.de | signed/encrypted
phone: +49 2402 102373 | cell: +49 173 5803043 | mail preferred
Jonny Lamb
2008-01-07 11:05:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Andreas Bierfert
but imo naming it librra is the right thing.
Done. It didn't need much of a change..!
--
Jonny Lamb, UK ***@jonnylamb.com
http://jonnylamb.com GPG: 0x2E039402
David Eriksson
2008-01-07 16:04:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jonny Lamb
Hi again,
Does anyone have any objections to me renaming the module "rra" to
"librra". It is already called "librra" in distribution packages (E.g.
[0]) and the name "librra" conforms more with other SynCE modules.
Of course, my rename would have no API change.
Perhaps I could be enlightened as to why this module was called "rra" in
the first place? After all, librapi2 contains a library and a number of
tools, just as rra does.
I'm quite sure that the discrepancy between "librapi2" and "rra" is of
my making and I probably regretted it but later accepted it as a fact,
as it's not so convenient to rename things in CVS compared to SVN.

I'm very pleased that you iron out issues like this!


Cheers,

David
Post by Jonny Lamb
Thanks,
[0] http://packages.debian.org/librra
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
--

Loading...